The Evolution Irritation Site!

 

 

 

Evilution is not science, but philosophy and religion!

READ THIS!
Evolution hits the Jackpot time and again How science & statistics don't matter anymore when you fervently want to believe something else!

Academic Peer Pressure Poor believers are forced to give up their faith or how others never got it in the first place!

Pocketbook Loyalties You cannot serve God & Mammon, nor Science falsely socalled! The real bottomline!

Quasars don't know either why they are sucking up all matter and energy and are portals to another "Universe" where our laws of physics COMPLETELY cease to exits! So, NO Evolutionists there! Thank God!

The leaky theory full of holes. Creation versus Evolution! Down to the fecal smelly nitty gritty.

A young Earth opposed to doddery Evilutionists
Youg Earth facts but never convincing enough for strict evolutionists. A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still!

Because we SAY SO! Silly Semantics of Strict Evolutionists Prepositions, protheses, presumptions and plain preconceived ideas. Throw it back in their strict teeth! Evol Fanatics! Scientific Fundamentalists and their evil Inquisition!

Blind as a bat
Prof. Dr. Satan and Prof Dr. Sagan and all his other anointed cronies! None so blind as those who refuse to see.

Humanist Philosophy
 for a 1000 Years! Or longer? God is dead, they hope Ha!

A little god with a strong will Evolution has a plan, like Marxism! Dialectics!

Religious viewpoints From religious Viewpoints

The Evilution of Sex? Yes! Hilarious! Now this is a hot page!


A Crane trying to act as if it was all by chance that she got so many different colors and that they all stay in their own places and not randomly mixed all over. Jackpot!

The Supernatural has NO place for Evolution!

Contrary to what little Bankboy "Sir" Julien Huxley had to say, that "Evolution had no place for the Supernatural!" Well it is the other way around!

If Talk Origins Site left you intimidated DO NO Fear! The True Origins Site answers all their false skewed diatribe with much better scientific reasoning.

From Dark to Light.
All was dark, until light came, while our primates were still blind

From Chaos to Reason
The Kingdom of Almighty God!

From Blind to Seeing
how the fish wished for sight! And got it! .

From Inertia to Moving
First you is a rock, now you is a fish!

Landbased to Airborne
How the graviationals took to the sky by sheer wil power! What is willpower?

Gravitationbound to Up and away!
How rocks starting swinning, walking and flying! What will be next?

Just Coincidenses
Evolution has a sense of humor if it created these!

Space to Wiggle
believers

BAAAAAANG
Were you there when it blew? How an explosion finally resulted in a Pentium 4 computer chip!

Pre mordial Soup
Where did the soup come from.

ROCK & WATER
Lightning and perculating life! Your soul is just electricity!

ENERRRRRGY!!!!
Where did Energy come from! From Matter! Where did matter come from? From energy! The chicken or the egg?

No Rock, No nothing
What was before evolution? GOD?

Evolution creates Cute and Evil
How does Evolution make such cute "good animals and such evil looking bad ones, as if to warn us?

The WET MODUS
 Why should species have evolved from water? Just because it is mainly water? That is a belief, not proof!

Spirit to Matter. From NON Creators to Creationists
From Sufferers to Problem Solvers
From Pagans to God
In the Image of Whom or What?
Why is Evolution so Benign? Why does Evolution not randomly kill us all off?

RELIGION POSING AS SCIENCE
Knowing or Science!—What IS Knowing?
"No philosophical theory which I have yet come across is a radical improvement
on the words of Genesis, that 'in the beginning God made Heaven & Earth!'" C.S. Lewis

THE LIMITS OF SCIENCE
"We talked about the Big Bang Theory, the Quasistatal Theory, the Continuous Generation Theory, the Planetessimal Theory, etc. When we got to the conclusion of that discussion, I asked the professor which of the particular theories was the one that is most acceptable and that satisfactorily explains the creation of matter from nothing. He leaned over the desk and looked me straight in the eye and said, "Young man, you need to learn to ask intelligent questions."
"That rather upset me. I did not appreciate that and I said, "Well, what do you mean?" He said, "This is not a question that a scientist tries to answer. This is a question for the philosopher or theologian, but this is not something that falls into the realm of science." I was very disturbed by that answer. I had always felt that science could ultimately answer all the questions that man had-- that there was nothing that science could not eventually take care of as far as what man might challenge and want to know about--yet this learned man, an expert in his field, said that this was an area that the scientist should not even try to answer--that it was totally beyond the capacity of science to explain and explore."
Excerpt from "Why I left Atheism" by John N. Clayton

DO EVOLUTIONIST SCIENTIST HAVE A MONOPOLY ON TRUTH?
Do Evolutionist scientists know better than the rest of us, the so-called "uninformed" about the origins of the Universe? Do they own some kind of "title-deed" to wisdom and knowledge, that they can patronise the rest of us, just because they happen to know some specialised causal relationships between some natural phenomena? Besides, does their kind of (empirical) knowing improve the quality of life?--Their quality of life, their way of life, that their best goal of living is, to make money out of their hobby of gathering facts? What is the "quality of life?" Is quality of life the real goal of living? Besides, what is the meaning, sense or goal of life? And what relationship does science have to it? These are questions we will seek to answer on this page!

DOES THE "UNIVERSE MACHINERY" HAVE MEANING OR NOT?
Scientists (fact freaks) gather facts to find causal relationships between natural phenomena, but in the process many of them become philosophers (meaning freaks), by embarking on a search for the origins of the facts and its theatre, the Universal machinery, or the "machine" of the Universe. One central question in that quest becomes: "Is there meaning/intelligent designer behind the machine, OR is the machine coincidental and meaningless without designer?"
There are several kinds of meaningseekers. One kind chooses that there must be a meaning-maker, and another one that denies (or you could very well say: detests) a meaningmaker.
But that is actually where their quest should stop, as they should realise that their mere looking for meaning implies meaning! As the philosopher C.S.Lewis stated:
"Atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning..."
But whether they take that hint or not, we still wind up with three kinds of origins for the Universe:

1. NO ORIGIN: UNIVERSE ALWAYS WAS, like an eternally boiling coffeepot
3. CREATION: UNIVERSE CREATED AT THE BEGINNING OF TIME.
2. EVOLUTION: EVOLVED FROM NOTHING BY CHANCE?

"If you are really a product of a materialistic universe, how is it that you don't feel at home there?" C.S. Lewis
"Truth and falsehood are opposed; but truth is the norm, not of truth only but of falsehood also." C.S. Lewis

Evolutionary Theology
 By Fred Reed
I recently wrote a column in which I referred to the theory of evolution as a religion, and received indignant inquiries as to what I meant. This is what I meant:
People are in varying degrees uncomfortable with uncertainty. Religion has usually provided the desired sense of understanding. Yet for many religion doesn't work. They say the various sacred books are flawed. Angels and their kin are not detectable by elaborate instruments connected to computers, and therefore cannot exist. And so they eschew religion.
Besides, the whole idea of religion seems less plausible in a city choked with traffic, in a life circumscribed by cubicles and plastic rugs than, say, in the vast stillness of a desert at three in the morning, with the wind soughing and that odd sense of nearness to the heavens.
So, out with religion. What then might provide an acceptable illusion of understanding?
Answer: The detailed and catalogued materialism that we call “science."
In many ways, it is a bad choice. The theoretical sciences consist only in the recognition that when certain circumstances exist, certain consequences follow. They are just a codification of the habits of nature. However, they have great moral force in today's world. Have they not provided us with computers, cars, medicines, and space stations? Do they not employ obscure runes and mathematical symbols of appalling mysteriousness? They must be true.
Their success has been such as to throw all else into shadow. Any cosmic explanation must be at least consistent with the sciences. This being so, the simple thing to do was to make the sciences the explanation.
This we have done. Instead of saying that Yahweh created the world, we say that the Big Bang did it. It is not much of an improvement. The Bang suffers from a failure to answer the question usually asked of religious stories of creation: Where did the Bang come from? What came before?
Just as in medieval times the literate clergy awed the peasantry by speaking Latin, so today's clergy emanate from the laboratories to astonish the laity with mispronounced Grecolatinate terminology.
Abracadabra, rebus sic stantibus, and acetylcholinesterase have the same effect on unalert minds. All resonate with awful mastery. It takes temerity to suggest that, say, Stephen Hawking's intelligence merely allows him to be more elaborately bewildered.
Religions require purposiveness. The Greater Materialism of the sciences provided it. Once the Bang had bung (or banged, maybe), why, the stars evolved, and the planets, and then what we usually think of as Evolution kicked in and life began itself. This of course led to that pinnacle of creation, Ourselves.
The popular understanding, probably shared in unguarded moments by academic evolutionists though they know better, is that Evolution is a force propelling life toward greater perfection. We speak of ourselves as Higher Primates, for example, though in terms of adaptation to environment we are inferior to tape worms and roaches. Popular evolution is suffused with a progress toward desired ends here that cannot be derived from the physics: Bang, gas, planets, trilobites, Los Angeles.
In short, evolution tells us where we came from, how we got where we are, where we are going, and what the guiding principle is.
This is what religions do.
The religious nature of this view becomes manifest in the intense hostility toward skepticism. If I questioned the value of pi, asserted that the earth was flat, or objected to the ideal gas law, I would be regarded as eccentric, but would not be savaged or loathed. People are confident of the value of pi. In any event it poses no threat to their sense of place in a dark and inhospitable universe.
But question evolution and the response will be anger, martial condescension, and rabid denial - usually from people who wouldn't know icthyostegids from the citric-acid cycle. (You don't have to know anything about evolution to be fierce about it.) They will be terrified that you might communicate this heresy to children. Further, with painful monotony they will accuse of Christianity. That is, their quick assumption is that you must represent a competing faith.
A difficulty with using physics as a religion (and all the sciences are elaborations of physics) is that you cannot get to things of transcendent importance to humans - beauty, consciousness, love and hatred, good and evil. These are no more contained in, or derivable from, physics than mass is derivable from plane geometry.
It's a religion.

EVOLUTIONISM THE THIRD RELIGION
Evolutionists claim they explore the machine to see how it works, but also put in a metaphysical origin, by proposing that the machine evolved or grew from nothing to everything.
Why do they search for the evolutionary origin of the machine? Because the only other alternative is that either the machine always was, OR that the apparatus was created. Meaning- and origin-seeking fact-freaks who cannot accept No. 1, as they somehow feel that the Universe had an origin, also reject No. 2, as that would entail an undesired divine authority, and therefore default to No. 3.
Why?? That's the mystery! Why didn't they accept the No. 1 solution? Because Evolution was kickstarted to find an alternative genesis! It was not started because of overwhelming evidence that the Universe grew into being and went through monumental changes that required research! If there had not been already a Genesis, Evolution would never have entered the mind of people.
But since there was a Genesis (the Biblical one), something inside them--lets call it psychology for their sake as we call it soul--told them that there is more to the Universe than just a "strange effects causing perpetuum mobile", and that is where either Evolution or Faith begins!
Faith is the acceptance, (even without a Bible), that there is something "behind the scenes." Musing/philosophising/mental puzzling/scientific researching, is by definition the opposite, no matter how you look at it, as basically "solution" No.3., Evolution, states that everything comes from nothing! "Ex Nihilo!" Matter and Energy came from Non-matter and Non-Energy. Light came from darkness, or visa versa, as there really should be no judgement or absolutism in their world vision, about what is better.

VOID AND DARKNESS ARE METAPHYSICAL ENTITIES!
We realise that Darkness exists by the grace of Light, and visa versa light by the grace of darkness, and Matter by the grace of Void and visa versa, as this polarity is reversable. Yet Evolutionists, lets call them "wanderers", prefer Matter & Light over Void & Darkness, because they themselves are matter and can only exist and know by the grace of light. But that preference already contains a moral judgment not in line with their "no absolutes" religion. Reasoning like that is a "Light & Matter Centeredness", not an objective position. Here some might protest that they are equally scientifically interested in VOID and DARKNESS, but that they are unknowable! But that is not true, but there are proportionately no funds for research into Emptyness and Darkness, to find out what they really are!
Why? Because they are not interesting? They are not interesting to them, because as nothingness and darkness are not compatible with their worldview, they have limited themselves to clap with one hand! Yet herein is a wondrous thing, because the one half would not exist without the other! These may be non-entities, but they are as real as their counterparts, but they do not research them, afraid that their research might lead to undesirable results, because Void and Darkness are as mysterious and potentially metaphysical as the claims of the No. 2 "meaning freaks!"
Darkness and Void smack to much of "God" to them, because their favoured research items in the matter and light section, function in the theatre of these two very real metaphysical entities, but they have no explanation for them.—No origins, no genesis, no reason, no research (no funds), no knowledge other than their plain existence. Even speed is not really measurable, as there is no absolute measurement in the theatre of non-existence. Yet speed exists! They cannot deny its existence. They may say of course that void is nothing, so how can it exist? Darkness is nothing, so how can it exist? But that is the thing, they do exist, and we dont know a thing about them or their orgins.
But that is mass & energy centrism of the absolute kind, a favoritism that is not scientific, but prejudiced, a state of mind like the earth is flat, or the sun orbits around the earth! And actually unwittingly they DO research it to a certain extent, you could say, by proxy, in the form of the study of Black holes, micro manifestations of non-mass, (they call it anti-matter) and non-energy! They say themselves, that, if it were possible, they would send a spaceship into one, to find out what they will find! God?

EVOLUTION IS A RELIGION, A PHILOSOPHY AND WORLDVIEW!
It is like they are caught between a rock and a hard place. So they think and exist, —penso ergo sum—in a continuum between MACRO darkness & void of the Universe, and MICRO darkness & void of Black Holes, and they measure their conception of ALL there is to know, by the movement they extrapolate in time they have never witnessed, by some present increments of movement of small amounts of matter, and fluctuations of the spectrum, through spectrum analysis.
That is a very big jump, comparable to a one second shift of the second hand on a clock, and on basis of some mininal progress they claim to observe, they extrapolate it into the billions of hours contained in 10.000s of years. Extrapolate is not the right word, as there is no standard movement of the spheres to base the extrapolation on, as the Universe itself is also really only a continuum between order and chaos, status quo and supernovea! It just isn't science nor scientific, as it is not observable or reproducable, that being my definition of knowing or science, it is philosophy and philosophical or religious! Any socalled "science" beyond the facts, is at the least presumption and at the most nonsense, in the true meaning of the word, no sense or meaning, as in their view or musing, the Machine has no agenda, no meaning, no sense whatsoever, other than what our religions 1,2,3 assign to them? In other words, both the Agnostics, the Theists and the Atheists are religions. So don't let any of them pretend to be more scientific than the others, because they are liars. As they say, you can prove almost anything from the Bible, so it goes for the accumulated body of the musings & wanderings of Evolutionism! They are all either presumption or faith! All three of them are religions, not science.

THE UNIVERSE IS A METAPHYSICAL PLACE!
We are all born as natural agnostics, or rather ignoramuses, into this cruel world, then become theists, as children have no trouble believing a gospel, but then a lot of humans nowadays, finally turn atheist in the course of their lives, rejecting spiritual authorities. But Science has proven the fact, that everyone has a religious experience and a mustard seed of faith as children or youngsters, no matter how small, and even those without religious training or a religious culture! Even those turned into the staunchest atheists! Children probably extrapolate parental authority into spiritual parentage, and all material causality into a spiritual causality, as everything comes from something in nature.
So what does all this philosophising prove scientifically? Not much! What can it inspire? A whole lot! But only in those who receive the inspiration gladly! Only in those who crave the seed of the unknown quantity that expresses itself so blatantly in light clothed in darkness, and in matter hiding in darkness, in a continuum suspended between a mysterious macro-world of endless space and the equally interesting micro cosmos, of which we also don't know how deep it goes.
By the way, I bet you that black holes are in fact unmeasurably small, ad infinitum! I just know it! Not by observation, as I didn't go through them yet! I know it by spiritual extrapolation that they are the opposite of the infinite macro cosmos. It is known by faith! Faith is a kind of knowing too! It's another kind of knowing! It is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen! It is not a worldly science, limited by observable facts, but a greater spiritual knowledge! It's like you feel it in your balls! Wow! How is that for God's science! Evolutionist religionists will by defnintion call it "bullocks"! Ha! Poor guys! They don't know what they're missing. All the spiritual thrills, spirit trips, angelic assistance, miraculous healings, Near Death Experiences (Yes! Blessings in disguise, and statistically known to improve ones life), answers to prayer, spiritual peace of mind and supernatural love for others, no fear of death, no more that lost feeling of utter futility, total confidence about their spiritual future and salvation. Sorry guys! But as He says in His Word, it is your own fault:

Psalm 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 49:10 For he seeth that wise men die, likewise the fool and the brutish person perish, and leave their wealth to others.
Psalm 53:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good.
Proverbs 14:16 A wise man feareth, and departeth from evil: but the fool rageth, and is confident.
Proverbs 26:3 A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the fool's back.
Proverbs 26:10 The great God that formed all things both rewardeth the fool, and rewardeth transgressors.
Ecclesiastes 2:14 The wise man's eyes are in his head; but the fool walketh in darkness: and I myself perceived also that one event happeneth to them all.
Ecclesiastes 2:15 Then said I in my heart, As it happeneth to the fool, so it happeneth even to me; and why was I then more wise? Then I said in my heart, that this also is vanity.
Ecclesiastes 2:16 For there is no remembrance of the wise more than of the fool for ever; seeing that which now is in the days to come shall all be forgotten. And how dieth the wise man? as the fool.
Ecclesiastes 4:5 The fool foldeth his hands together, and eateth his own flesh.
Ecclesiastes 6:8 For what hath the wise more than the fool? what hath the poor, that knoweth to walk before the living?
Ecclesiastes 7:6 For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fool: this also is vanity.

EXTRA QUOTES
"Who can endure a doctrine which would allow only dentists to say whether our teeth were aching, only cobblers to say whether our shoes hurt us, and only governments to tell us whether we were being well governed?" C.S.LEWIS -- The Case for Christianity

"God has landed on this enemy-occupied world in human form...The perfect surrender and humiliation was undergone by Christ: perfect because He was God, surrender and humiliation because He was man." "Now is our chance to choose the right side. God is holding back to give us that chance. It won't last forever. We must take it or leave it." C.S.LEWIS --

"A great many of those who 'debunk' traditional...values have in the background values of their own which they believe to be immune from the debunking process." C.S.LEWIS -- The Abolition of Man

"If naturalism were true then all thoughts whatever would be wholly the result of irrational causes...it cuts its own throat." C.S. Lewis -- A Christian Reply to Professor Price

"When you are arguing against Him you are arguing against the very power that makes you able to argue at all." C.S.LEWIS -- Mere Christianity.

VISIT OUR

Beyond the Stars webring
BEYOND THE STARS HOMEPAGE


VISIT OUR NEXT SITE:

A HEAVENLY PARADISE

E-mail us at Beyond7stars@yahoo.com
All artwork on this page gotten from Public Domain, except "back to the garden" "Ark" and "Golden Pyramid" pics and "logo", © Copyrighted 1999-2001 by Beyond the Stars Productions. If anyone owns the public domain pictures please contact us with proof and we shall replace them, or give credit where credit is due! Site Copyrights © 2000-2001 Beyond the Stars Productions, SEE ALSO: Further Copyrights Notice